For partners that build or integrate commercially available applications and service solutions with the Oracle Cloud Platform
For partners that provide implementation or managed services around Oracle Cloud Applications
In our organisation, we have resources who work together as teams. Generally these team assignments will be the same during the working day, but there are some use cases where team assignments can change part way through the day.
We have been looking to utilise Teamwork functionality as a way to achieve this, however we have found a fundamental limitation with Teamwork which i wanted to share, and discuss to see if other customers have similar use cases and any suggestions on how to achieve the desired outcome.
When we assign teamwork activities, we can specify a duration of the activity. However, OFSC logic does not pay attention to this duration in terms of the sharing of skills. In a test that i've conducted (see attachment for details), i assigned one resource as an assistant for the first half of the day, and another assistant with a different skill for the 2nd half of the day. OFSC doesn't seem to recognise that the assistants are only assisting for part of the day and assumes their skill contributions are available all day. This fundamentally does not support our use case.
Does anybody else have similar scenarios? If so, what have you done to achieve them?
Hi
Is is possible to upload a shapefile that is stored locally in my laptop?
From documentation it seems it is only possible to upload shapefiles that are accessible over HTTPS protocol over a public network. The wish is to keep these files not public.
Regards,
Diana Cunha
We have a message scenario configured to Inventory is Deinstalled launch condition, where we need to pass some inventory custom properties like I_SUBINVENTORY_CODE,I_SUBINVENTORY to external application. When we push resource inventory to OFSC from external system we pass values to above custom properties only.
Within message scenario body when we use these properties system does not return any value but when we use A_SUBINVENTORY_CODE,A_SUBINVENTORY properties the values in I_SUBINVENTORY_CODE,I_SUBINVENTORY are returned. Unable to understand this behavior, did anybody face the same issue? or could anybody plz help me understand how is this possible?
Hi All, We observed that none of the 19c version Resource Management Rest API's return the resource email field in the response. We have custom Tech2Tech transfer functionality where we get the recipient email address in OFSC using Rest APi and pass it on to external system within the plugin. Now it is broken and also there are many other functionalities driven by email address and all are broken.
May I know why this change has been made to the API's and now how to get resource email. Added email field to Resource Management section with read/write permission in Configuration=>Application but no luck.
Thanks,
Dhanapal
Hi Team, I dont see the resource inventory form in LegacyManage screen configuration to add or remove columns displayed. Is there anyway to customize it? Under Legacy Manage screen configuration we do only have Resource Info context.
Hi All, As technicians displayed during Activity Move operation are not sorted, displayed randomly. We have a requirement to sort them by last name, is there a seeded way to do so if not how can we achieve this please. Please see the attached for reference.
Hi Team, There is a requirement to provide flexibility for tech's to maintain credentials for a third party application which tech can access from Mobility. Planning to define two user properties and add them to User Options window. But the properties added are not visible in the User Options visual editor form. May I know if any additional setup to be done to make them visible to the form please.
Hello Experts, Trying to find if there is any documentation for standard actions available like add_deinstall_inventory, add_deinstall_inventory_started, list_inventories, list_queue_inventories etc. COuld you share if anybody know please.
is presented by the functional area in which they find locations with work orders where it is possible to install material after sending closure validation, when reviewing it is evidenced that this occurs when the same is worked parallel order with two different users, one is the technician user and the other is the dispatch supervisor user, it occurs while the property A_VALIDADOR_RESULT_CODE-code validating result in Sending is set in the manual_message step Step 2.B- Sending Validate Close. Video is attached where the situation is replicated.
IS THERE ANY WAY FOR THAT PROPERTY TO BE SET IN LESS TIME, AS WE HAVE SEEN IT DOES IT IN 30 MINUTES, OR IF THERE IS ANOTHER WAY OF CONTROLLING THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE EQUIPMENT IS NOT INSTALLED WHILE THE TECHNICIAN THIS MOBILE INTERFACE SENDING THE CLOSURE VALIDATION AND OBTAIN A CORRECT VALIDATION RESPONSE.
I'm currently working on an OFSC implementation and as part of our delinquency process, my organization prints tags (4X8in) showing balance due for each customer in order for them to restore service. We are a state-based organization that is required to print these tags- not printing is not an option.
The implementer I'm working with hasn't worked with customers that print and referred me to this forum, along with some information to read for plug-in configuration. We have been told the printing will function via a plug in, but I'm looking for some preliminary feedback. With as broad as OFSC is, there has to be folks that are printing. We suspect we won't be able to print directly from the browser and we'll need a middle man application (like Bartender) to take the data from OFSC and put it into a 4x8in format.
If there is anyone out there that is printing information from OFSC? What is your set up and experience with it?
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
29 | 30 | 31 |