Purchasing

Get Involved. Join the Conversation.

Comments

  • Aishwarya Tiwari

    Hi Kim,

    I have a similar requirement and as you have mentioned that the attribute Entity Change Type can be used to route for cost center approvals for the the lines that have been added.

    However, in case of PO change orders, if I am adding a new line or updating an existing line, is there any way in which we can configure to send for approval ONLY to the approval hierarchy for the line added / updated instead of all the approvals using this attribute.

    If you have any idea can you please confirm.

     

    Thanks

    Aishwarya

  • Anusha K

    Hi ,

    There is a new feature in Rel13 for closure of Purchase orders 

    ocumentation can be found for this new feature R13 Manage Purchase Orders.
    Search for "closure Purchase Order Schedules Using a Spreadsheet: Procedure.'

    Thanks,

    Anusha

  • Ashok

    That would be a partial or line level approval. That is not supported. I checked with the Purchasing folks as well. 

  • Aishwarya Tiwari

    Thanks Ashok for confirmation..

    However, in case of PO change orders, if I am adding a new line or updating an existing line, is there any way in which we can configure to send for approval only to the approval hierarchy for the line added / updated instead of all the approvals.

    Thanks

    Aishwarya

     

     

  • Ashok

    Aishwarya
    What you are asking sounds like partial approvals or line level approvals. This is not supported in Purchasing or Self Service Procurement at this time. If I have misunderstood the question let me know.

  • Pawan Gadade

    Hi Swati & Nitin,
    Good Day!

    At current stage this task is not able to proceed 1 day records (which is much less than the current capacity i.e. 5000 records). We tried to run this task for multiple times for single day duration but every time we received error stating "Unable run Close Schedule in Spreadsheet error- ORA-56720: I/O data limit exceeded - call abort"

    Please let us know if this bug/error will get resolved by release 20A. Even if it is working for 1 day we can run this task multiple time.

    Regards,

    Pawan

     

     

     

  • Suman Guha

    Jon,

    Assuming that you have already figured out where to store the location that you would like to use for your orders for these punch out items, you would need to extend the BI publisher data model to include this location. And then create a custom mapping where you would override the standard mapping to the Ship to Location Id element to use this new location attribute from the data model.

    Regards,

    Suman.

     

  • Vikram Raghunathan

    sorry for getting back late on this. Yes we have the PO set at legal entity. One of our client requirements was to prefix the org code before the PO Number. We have as of now suggested Integrated cloud services to achieve this. I think as of now in manage procurement document numbering, it is a hardcoded prefix.

  • Suman Guha

    Ok thanks for confirming. This is as per design and has always been. Attachments at supplier site level are meant to flow down to the transactions where those sites are references whereas attachments like proof of insurance, 1099s are typically attached at the supplier level.

    Could you clarify what's driving the need to have these carried at the site level versus on the supplier itself?

  • Jim Van Tongerloo
    Feel free to mark it as best/correct answer.
  • Swati Gupta

    Hi Pawan,

    Please confirm that you are talking about patch for bug fix 29368899 (which is not an enhancement request) to be released in 20A.

    Thanks,

    Swati

  • Caio Zioli

    Hi all, please, are there any perspective of having application composer available for ERP Procurement Cloud ? 

    Once available, would it be possible to create custom tables on application composer ? If yes, would it be able to handle high amount of data ?

  • Jim Van Tongerloo

    This is correct. The tree will show how the application is calculating who should approve.

    However, after Aycan receives the first notification and approves, he will not receive a second or a third. It will be considered approved.

    Jim

  • Mukund Kudrimoti

    Thanks

  • Jim Van Tongerloo

    Hi Mukund,

    Just use the FBDI to import the legacy PO's with their own number.

    Setup the PO document numbering in Cloud counting from the last number you used +1, or use a completely new numbering.

    Jim