Posts

Posts

  • Jesus Escobar
    Not allow more on-hand for an article.
    Topic posted 1:48 PM by Jesus EscobarBronze Medal: 1,250+ Points, tagged Inventory Cloud, SCM, Setup in Inventory and Logistics > Inventory public
    Title:
    Not allow more on-hand for an article.
    Summary:
    Not allow more on-hand for an article.
    Content:
    Greetings to all,
     
    I have a doubt, regarding sub-inventories and locators, there is some logical way to indicate that within a sub-inventory it cannot exceed a certain on hand for an article.
     
    for Subinventory A and ARTICLE # 1 must not exceed 1000 available.
     
    The same for a locator suppose that in a SUB-INVENTORY A, LOCATED A.B.C according to a value of segment C, does not allow the translation but the availability. that is ONHAND <= C or create some rule to place the same value of a segment
    Version:
    19C (11.13.19.07.0)
  • Mohammad Arif Zaffar
    Purpose of Depreciable in subinventory creation screen2
    Topic posted 9:05 AM by Mohammad Arif ZaffarBronze Medal: 1,250+ Points, tagged Setup in Inventory and Logistics > Inventory public
    Title:
    Purpose of Depreciable in subinventory creation screen
    Summary:
    Purpose of Depreciable in subinventory creation screen
    Content:

    Hello, 

    What is the Purpose of Depreciable in subinventory creation screen 

    Document:
  • Max Basandrai
    Total Tax on PO1
    Topic posted 8:14 AM by Max BasandraiBlue Ribbon: 750+ Points, tagged Create Requisition, Financials, Fusion, How-To, Orders, Procurement Contracts, Requisition Processing, Setup in Procurement > Purchasing public
    Title:
    Total Tax on PO
    Summary:
    Remove Total Tax on PO
    Content:

    The client would like to remove the total tax from being calculated from the PO so only the ordered amount remains.

    Version:
    19C (11.13.19.07.0)
  • Max Basandrai
    Error message for Venezuelian BU1
    Topic posted 3:05 AM by Max BasandraiBlue Ribbon: 750+ Points, tagged Approvals, Approvals/Notification, Create Requisition, Requisition Processing, Setup in Procurement > Self Service Procurement public
    Title:
    Error message for Venezuelian BU
    Summary:
    Error due when raising an amount based fpr Venezuela
    Content:

    * Create a Non Cat PR for Venezuela (Currency VES)

    * Select Quantity Based all is fine

    * Select amount based and error occurs

    * An application error has occurred. Your help desk can use the following information to obtain a more detailed description of this incident: 22, Server Domain: FADomain, Server Instance: UIServer_as1_02, Application Name: ORA_FSCM_UIAPP.
     

     

    Version:
    19C (11.13.19.07.0)
  • Raj Kamal
    B2B PO Export using Collabration Message framework1
    Topic posted Yesterday by Raj KamalGreen Ribbon: 100+ Points, tagged Orders, Setup, Supplier Communication, Web Services in Procurement > Purchasing public
    Title:
    B2B PO Export using Collabration Message framework
    Summary:
    B2B PO Export using Collabration Message framework
    Content:

    Hi,

    I am trying to setup B2B Collaboration messaging using a service provider to send Purchase Order. Jaggaer is our middleware vendor. I am using web service provided by Jagger however they mentioned that they don’t any authentication on webservice and no userid and password should be passed. When I configure a service provider in "Manage Collaboration Messaging Service Providers" under tools -> Collaboration Messaging without a userid and password, I am getting error Userid is required. Please see attached screenshot for my setup and error message.

    Any idea on how i can deal with this situation?

    Regards,

    Raj

  • Dev Thota
    Suggestions in Return to Vendor process15.0
    Topic posted Yesterday by Dev ThotaGold Trophy: 10,000+ Points, tagged Approvals, Approvals/Notification, BI Publisher Reports, Business Intelligence, Create Requisition, How-To, Manage Procurement Catalog, OTBI, Public Sector, Requisition Processing, Setup, White Paper in Inventory and Logistics > Inventory public
    Title:
    Suggestions in Return to Vendor process
    Summary:
    Suggestions in Return to Vendor process
    Content:

    Hi All,

     

    While responding to a High-Tech Contract Manufacturer Client RFP, looking for suggestions to provide solution for their major pain point - ‘Return to Vendor’.

     

    For them, this is an issue, since once they receive the goods in Inventory, they may use it only after 3-6 months. While using in Work order, if they find any item is defective, they raise OSP for this item and send to Supplier for repair/replacement.

    They have to raise OSP instead of Return to Vendor, because of the delay in using the items in Work order, and by that time, Purchase Order against which item was received would have been Finally Closed.

     

    We are planning to suggest Oracle Cloud – Return to Vendor with replacement. Kindly suggest :

    1.     How can we address returns for Finally Closed POs ?

    2.     If any better solution to above problem?

     

    Thanks,

    Dev Thota

    Version:
    19D
  • Ashok
    Update 19D Opt-in Expiration Features15.0
    Topic posted November 10, 2019 by AshokBlack Diamond: 60,000+ Points, tagged Setup, Tip in Procurement > Self Service Procurement public
    Title:
    Update 19D Opt-in Expiration Features
    Summary:
    Features that expire in Update 19D
    Content:

    Customers / Support

    This is a quick tip to remind you that the following features expire in Update 19D that were introduced for Fusion Self Service Procurement in prior updates. 

    Why is this important:

    If your users notice a change in behavior in flows related to these features and ask why, you should be able to explain this change. Note that this is only likely to happen if you have not opted in to these features earlier or are newly implementing Fusion in 19D.

    Ideally, customers and support should review this link to make sure they are well aware of upcoming feature expiration to prepare and ready themselves both in terms of user education and system configuration:

    https://www.oracle.com/webfolder/technetwork/tutorials/tutorial/cloud/r13/wn/2019-optin.htm

    See screenshot below for the specific features expiring in Update 19D

     

    Image:
  • Ashok
    Customer Input Please: Approvals Question6
    Topic posted November 7, 2019 by AshokBlack Diamond: 60,000+ Points, tagged Approvals, Setup in Procurement > Self Service Procurement public
    Title:
    Customer Input Please: Approvals Question
    Summary:
    Please provide your input to this Approvals related query
    Content:

    Hello Customers

    I have an Approvals related query. We have been reviewing the approvals configuration internally in context of questions and features that you have asked about.

    One of the features that we support today (Please see the screenshot for context) is Supervisory Hierarchy based approvals. Of course, as you are all aware, this can be configured to start with various types of users: Preparer, Requester, Specific Worker, etc.

    My question is on: Specific Worker

    Once you select Specific Worker, the system then ask whether the approval hierarchy should begin with said worker or Manager of Specific Worker

    Question for you:

    Do you use Manager of Specific Worker in your approval rule configurations? 

    If yes, can you provide some business driven examples / use cases?

    Why we want to know:

    We are interested in understanding if these features are being used and how that may drive future direction on whether to support these going forward.

    Thanks in advance for your time and participation.

  • Jon Kelly
    19D Update Account and Budget Date on Budgetary-Controlled...25.0
    Topic posted November 7, 2019 by Jon KellySilver Trophy: 7,500+ Points, tagged FAQ, Financials, Setup in Procurement > Purchasing public
    Title:
    19D Update Account and Budget Date on Budgetary-Controlled Open Purchase Orders
    Content:

    We are testing out the changes for the 19D upgrade and trying to confirm what specifically this change is supposed to make. We've been able to make changes to the line or distributions prior to this, so we're not exactly sure what we're looking at. The functional users and I have tested and don't find any visible difference or option. I'm including the description and link below. Thanks!

    Jon

    Upgrade notes:

    Change account and budget date on open purchase orders, even if subject to budgetary control. You can make the changes if there are no project references on the purchase order distributions. The necessary funds checks and adjustments to funds reservations and encumbrance accounting when applicable are handled based on the updated information. This is done by automatically liquidating funds reserved against the old account and budget date, and reserving funds to the new account and budget date.

    https://www.oracle.com/webfolder/technetwork/tutorials/tutorial/cloud/r13/wn/proc/releases/19D/19D-procurement-wn.htm#F5657

     

  • Akash Jadhao
    Change Order Cost Center manager Approval at line level1
    Topic posted November 6, 2019 by Akash JadhaoGreen Ribbon: 100+ Points, tagged Approvals, Approvals/Notification, Fusion, How-To, Setup in Procurement > Purchasing public
    Title:
    Change Order Cost Center manager Approval at line level
    Summary:
    Whenever there is change order happens against PO and changes done at line level the change order should follow newly added line cost center manager approval hierarchy not the existing lines
    Content:

    There is change order(XX)exist against PO (***) and which are having status either Incomplete/Pending Approvals or Approved.

    Requirement : If new line are been added in to change order(XX) then it should always follow the newly added lines (cost center) approval hiearachy. 

    Rules are written on amount changed at header level including the cost center numbers with respect cost center manger approvals and which is working fine.

    User needs that,if there is additonal line added in the change order then it should only follow the added lines cost center manager approvals not the exisiting lines cost center approvers.

    Is there any attributes where We can compare the cost center with existing lines cost center and build approval hieararchy around it.

    Can any one help on the same.

     

     

    Version:
    Fusion 19C
    Image: