For partners that build or integrate commercially available applications and service solutions with the Oracle Cloud Platform
For partners that provide implementation or managed services around Oracle Cloud Applications
A significant change has been introduced in the Back-to-Back Supply Creation and Fulfillment flow in release 18C. The old and new behaviors are summarized below.
Old behavior (till release 18B) - After a Back-to-Back sales order line is scheduled, users have to run (either manually or by setting up a schedule) the Planning ESS job Release Planning Recommendations to initiate supply creation.
New Behavior (from 18C onwards) – After a Back-to-Back sales order line is scheduled, users do not have to run (or schedule) the Release Planning Recommendations ESS job to create Back-to-Back supply. Supply Chain Orchestration (SCO) will directly read Global Order Promising (GOP) promising data/supply recommendations for a scheduled order fulfillment line and automatically initiate supply creation. This change will apply to Configure-to-Order and Back-to-Back Contract Manufacturing flows as well.
Oracle Global Order Promising Cloud checks supply availability and schedules orders as they arrive. But how does it decide exactly which supply to use for your orders? The attached whitepaper demonstrates the process.
We have an order with requested (ship) date set in the future. The same order was submitted and the line got into scheduling error with the message. "The request date passed to order promising is outside the range of the planning horizon. (DOO-2685269)"
Where can we check to determine the "range of the planning horizon? What drives this which lead to the scheduling failing on order line with a request date in the future. The item has available on hand.
Hi,
B2B Sales Order line Stuck with status "Waiting" not passed to awaiting shipping.i have attached print screen for this issue.
thanks
Hi All,
Create Orchestration(Test Back to Back) for Back to Back Order( Copy from Standard).
Add processing constraints, if "Test Back to Back" and Warehouse is blank, it should error out.
I am able to create Order type "Test Back to Back" not appearing in create order screen.
Thanks,
Dev Thota.
Hello,
we can create thousands of orders via one import batch.
Some of these orders have to be scheduled/reserved before the others. My idea was to position the orders within the import file according to their priority. However when importing for example 1 to 1000 orders, the system created them randomly, completely disregarding the order in the import file.
What do you suggest to handle this priority for the schedule and reservation step, which are ‘automatic enabled’ in the orchestration process?
Thank you,
Hi,
Could you please let me know how to Configure Zebra Printer for Printing of Address Labels for Shipping in Order Management Cloud?
What are the integration steps?
Thanks
Ekansh
Hi
facing an error in sales order 300000182505288 for orchestration process 300000182505282 failed. Use the appropriate Order Orchestration work area action to recover this task. (DOO-2685501)
Item is to be shipped to customer from 001 Warehouse. , 001 will source from 002 warehouse, 002 will source from 003 and finally 003 will buy from Supplier. The GOP is setup as per the requirement and Planning will be used.
facing the issue when i submit the Sales order.
any help will be appreciated.
thanks
Hi Champs,
We have a scenario as stated below. Any inputs/approach shared would be of much help and appreciated. Thanks
1. Consider that an order was placed on 01-June-2019 for 100 Qty of item A and since there was no stock for this (Say) , a PO was created for the same qty with its Receipt date was 10-June. Hence on 10-June the Qty on hand was 100
2. On 10-June another sales order was created for the same item for 100 qty (say) and the demand of new sales order picked up the PO supply that is indicated above.
In total, the original sales order that was placed on 01-June still remains unfulfilled at large.
In order to avoid this situation, the need to have an ad-hoc pegging to incoming PO supplies is needed.
Please note that ,above case is NOT to be taken as back-to-back in nature, because back to back will be used in the event some special items are ordered
Thanks,
Sunil
In case of Supply chain availability based my understanding is item availability depends on
1. If reservable qty available, SO should be reserved without delay
2. If qty not available ATP should look for sourcing rule, calculate transit time and total lead time for WO/PO and provide scheduled ship date based on that.
Correct me if I am missing anything.
I have reservable qty available in Inv Org in both sub inv 100 qty each (SO does not look at Sub Inv level right? It only looks for Inv level), but if I give warehouse as my Inv org and do estimate order availability, it says Sales Order availability status delay for 360 days. Looks to me it's not getting onhand and hence going outside of planning horizon. The SO gets reserved with status as Delayed. The ATP setups are done like following doc.
https://www.oracle.com/webfolder/community/fusion_applications/4150761.html