Integrationpublic

Integration

Get Involved. Join the Conversation.

This is a public Forum  public

Topic

    Simon
    Issue when using existing integration flow in new...Answered
    Topic posted November 7, 2019 by Simon Green Ribbon: 100+ Points, last edited November 7, 2019, tagged Cloud, Integration, Mapping, REST 
    27 Views, 5 Comments
    Title:
    Issue when using existing integration flow in new integration
    Summary:
    Call - Integration action doesn't let me map outputs
    Content:

    When I configure a step in my new integration to call an existing integration I'm having an issue mapping input and output.

    I don't get the option to map my template parameters in the input, only see the GET element, no child elements.

    Similarly, even though the output of the existing integration is defined as JSON, in my new flow I'm only getting a GETResponse complex type, without any child elements. The existing service is properly configured and working fine, I can call it (e.g. using postman) and am getting the response I expect.

    Is the functionality to call an existing integration only designed to kick off another integration, which doesn't require inputs and doesn't produce any output?

    Image:
    Document:
    2019-11-07 13_20_54-Integration.png (6KB)
    Document:
    2019-11-07 13_23_33-Integration.png (19KB)
    Document:
    2019-11-07 13_26_04-Mozilla Firefox (Private Browsing).png (52KB)

    Best Comment

    Hemanth Lakkaraju

    There is a known issue at the moment, if you are using MVRP feature, you cannot use Local Integration feature. You have to use explicit REST invokes.

    Comment

     

     

    community forum