For partners that build or integrate commercially available applications and service solutions with the Oracle Cloud Platform
For partners that provide implementation or managed services around Oracle Cloud Applications
Don't think so. If it were the documentation would have indicated the same.
There are two other features that many of you in this forum would be interested in:
1) REST service support for Purchase Order Close, Final Close
2) Project Driven Supply Chain: In Procurement this feature would enable you to request/order for replenishment of stock designated for usage within a Project.
Ramesh,
Depending on the cohort that you are in, you will be upgraded to 20A either in Jan or Feb or March.
Regards,
Suman.
Please refer to this forum post: https://cloudcustomerconnect.oracle.com/posts/34420b8641
Moved from Purchasing forum.
Hi Srilatha,
Did you log a SR? If so, please provide SR#.
Regards,
Suman.
Hello Kumar,
Rules based assignment of buyers to requisitions already available in the product.
https://fusionhelp.oracle.com/fscmUI/topic/TopicId_P_F5881FE1342FC178E040D30A68814307
Please let us know if you are encountering gaps in utilizing it for your business use case.
Regards,
Suman.
Moving this to the Inventory forum for review by the Inventory team.
Jon,
Assuming that you have already figured out where to store the location that you would like to use for your orders for these punch out items, you would need to extend the BI publisher data model to include this location. And then create a custom mapping where you would override the standard mapping to the Ship to Location Id element to use this new location attribute from the data model.
Regards,
Suman.
Ok thanks for confirming. This is as per design and has always been. Attachments at supplier site level are meant to flow down to the transactions where those sites are references whereas attachments like proof of insurance, 1099s are typically attached at the supplier level.
Could you clarify what's driving the need to have these carried at the site level versus on the supplier itself?
Moved from Purchasing forum for the Budgetary Control team to review.
I don't look at it as an issue or as a bug. If you are grouping two requisition lines into one with different prices, it makes a lot more sense to use a real price from one of the lines versus doing some mathematical jugglery to avoid amount mismatch. What you observe is indeed the design intent.
Are these attachments on the Supplier itself? Or one of its sites?
Moved from Purchasing forum.
REST service support for Close/Final close is planned for 20A. Safe Harbor applies.